Commit 1dbbe3d9 authored by Friedrich Horschig's avatar Friedrich Horschig Committed by Commit Bot

[Linux][Flaky] Disable ChromeSignInWebViewTest.NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest

This test has a history of flakiness (see linked bug). Although the
failure happens on Windows as well, the retry seems to succeed reliably
enough.
Flakiness Dashboard shows flakiness on linux-chromeos-rel as well, so
disabling for all of linux.

TBR=ekaramad@chromium.org

Bug: 914098
Change-Id: Idfd3680040c0dba5b52504d5808c2840611dd1c4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1373768Reviewed-by: default avatarFriedrich Horschig [CET] <fhorschig@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Friedrich Horschig [CET] <fhorschig@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#615922}
parent 2f261d21
...@@ -4280,8 +4280,15 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(ChromeSignInWebViewTest, ...@@ -4280,8 +4280,15 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(ChromeSignInWebViewTest,
// page with both an attached and an unattached <webview> and verifies that, // page with both an attached and an unattached <webview> and verifies that,
// unlike the attached guest, no find requests are sent for the unattached // unlike the attached guest, no find requests are sent for the unattached
// guest. For more context see https://crbug.com/897465. // guest. For more context see https://crbug.com/897465.
// TODO(crbug.com/914098): Address flakiness and reenable.
#if defined(OS_LINUX)
#define MAYBE_NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest \
DISABLED_NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest
#else
#define MAYBE_NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest
#endif
IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(ChromeSignInWebViewTest, IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(ChromeSignInWebViewTest,
NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest) { MAYBE_NoFindInPageForUnattachedGuest) {
GURL signin_url{"chrome://chrome-signin"}; GURL signin_url{"chrome://chrome-signin"};
ui_test_utils::NavigateToURL(browser(), signin_url); ui_test_utils::NavigateToURL(browser(), signin_url);
auto* embedder_web_contents = auto* embedder_web_contents =
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment