Commit 517858d2 authored by Eric Roman's avatar Eric Roman Committed by Commit Bot

Remove mention of the defunct "proxy" URLRequestContext.

Bug: 715697
Change-Id: Ia64e5e9929a85bccb1a0124a5eff7dd3c72e453a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1175144Reviewed-by: default avatarMatt Menke <mmenke@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eric Roman <eroman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#583091}
parent d5fea16d
......@@ -25,10 +25,8 @@ URLRequestContextBuilder to do this.
Chrome has a number of different URLRequestContexts, as there is often a need to
keep cookies, caches, and socket pools separate for different types of requests.
Here are the ones that the network team owns:
Here are the main ones used by Chrome browser:
* The proxy URLRequestContext, owned by the IOThread and used to get PAC
scripts while avoiding re-entrancy.
* The system URLRequestContext, also owned by the IOThread, used for requests
that aren't associated with a profile.
* Each profile, including incognito profiles, has a number of URLRequestContexts
......@@ -39,7 +37,8 @@ that are created as needed:
like the HostResolver.
* Each non-incognito profile also has a media request context, which uses a
different on-disk cache than the main request context. This prevents a
single huge media file from evicting everything else in the cache.
single huge media file from evicting everything else in the cache. (See also
crbug.com/789657)
* On desktop platforms, each profile has a request context for extensions.
* Each profile has two contexts for each isolated app (One for media, one
for everything else).
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment