Revert of PaymentApp: Introduce PaymentAppDatabase class. (patchset #3...
Revert of PaymentApp: Introduce PaymentAppDatabase class. (patchset #3 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2560293002/ ) Reason for revert: Broke content_unittests: [ RUN ] PaymentAppManagerTest.SetAndGetManifest [libprotobuf ERROR c:\b\c\b\win\src\third_party\protobuf\src\google\protobuf\message_lite.cc:120] Can't parse message of type "content.PaymentAppManifestProto" because it is missing required fields: (cannot determine missing fields for lite message) c:\b\c\b\win\src\content\browser\payments\payment_app_manager_unittest.cc(145): error: Value of: payments::mojom::PaymentAppManifestError::NONE Actual: PaymentAppManifestError::NONE Expected: read_error Which is: PaymentAppManifestError::MANIFEST_STORAGE_OPERATION_FAILED [ FAILED ] PaymentAppManagerTest.SetAndGetManifest (3 ms) Original issue's description: > PaymentApp: Introduce PaymentAppDatabase class. > > The class is providing APIs to read/write payment app related data(e.g. manifest > and associated service worker). It can be shared between payment_app_manager.cc > and payment_app_context.cc. > > The payment_app_manager.cc contains a actual implementation of the > PaymentAppManager interface[1] used on the page or worker. > Also, the payment_app_context.cc can be used to query all manifests data[2] > in order to update payment request UI in Chrome layer. > > We can summarize this CL as follows. > 1. Rename PaymentAppContext in content/browser/payments to > PaymentAppContextImpl and then add PaymentAppContext interface in > content/public to expose some APIs to Chrome layer. > 2. Write PaymentAppDatabase class and then move most of logics to access > database from PaymentAppManager to the new class. > 3. Add a interface to query all manifests data in Chrome layer but it's not > implemented yet in this CL. It will be implemented in follow-up CL[2]. > > [1] https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-payment-apps-api/#payment-app-manager > [2] https://codereview.chromium.org/2556433002 > > BUG=661608 > TEST=existing unittests > > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2560293002 TBR=rouslan@chromium.org,avi@chromium.org,tommyt@opera.com,jinho.bang@samsung.com # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=661608 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2565423002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#437861}
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment