Commit f6a53419 authored by Ryan Heise's avatar Ryan Heise Committed by Commit Bot

Add dashboard monitoring to perf sheriff duties

Change-Id: I56eec3ca11785a6d796d28ca07220f4aa6ff1212
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2486542
Auto-Submit: Ryan Heise <heiserya@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Wenbin Zhang <wenbinzhang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohn Chen <johnchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarWenbin Zhang <wenbinzhang@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#818792}
parent e31db274
...@@ -38,7 +38,9 @@ roll](https://autoroll.skia.org/r/catapult-autoroll), which should ...@@ -38,7 +38,9 @@ roll](https://autoroll.skia.org/r/catapult-autoroll), which should
automatically TBR the sheriff. If the catapult roll fails, the sheriff should automatically TBR the sheriff. If the catapult roll fails, the sheriff should
investigate and revert suspect changelists. investigate and revert suspect changelists.
The sheriff should *not* feel like responsible for investigating hard problems. The volume of incoming alerts makes this infeasible. Instead, they should delegate deep investigations to the right owners. As a rule of thumb, a trained sheriff should expect to spend 10-20 minutes per alert and should never be spending more than an hour per alert. Near the end of their shift, sheriffs should also inspect[this dashboard](https://dashboards.corp.google.com/_e3cbeb60_d250_4e67_8795_56cd9af8a303) for the time covered during their shift, and do a first-pass analysis of any anomalies (e.g. jobs taking 6 hours when they normally take 1.5).
The sheriff should *not* feel responsible for investigating hard problems. The volume of incoming alerts makes this infeasible. Instead, they should delegate deep investigations to the right owners. As a rule of thumb, a trained sheriff should expect to spend 10-20 minutes per alert and should never be spending more than an hour per alert.
## Workflow ## Workflow
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment